Stronger than the first read suggested. Still not finished.

Hero scatter — the teal particle bloom reads as signal/data, not ornament. Carries the "system" thesis visually before a word of copy. Impact briefing card — Operator / Role / Engagements / Scope / Window as an identity block. The clearest positioning device on the site. Double Diamond (About) — the Don't know→Could be / Do know→Should be spread, with Discover/Define/Develop/Deliver nested underneath, is genuinely distinctive IA. Signal → Story — the film grid works; keeps the case for taste without arguing for it.

I said kill the decorative wave — wrong. The desktop hero scatter is the strongest first impression on the site. I said the aerospace metaphor was overreach on About — partly wrong. The Double Diamond application is the best structural moment in the portfolio. Those stay. What actually needs work is elsewhere: the light-mode section that breaks the system, the isolated credential card, and the four visually-identical sections below the diamond.

"CX · Product · Service transformation" is a category, not a title. Recruiters need a seniority signal in the first 10 seconds.

Floating big number with no baseline. Credible-looking but dismissible. One sentence closes the gap.

The stubs are the biggest credibility gap on the site. The QA report is right: the ratio of presentation quality to case study depth is the actual AI tell. The markdown you sent is 90% there — ship it.

Output metric sitting next to outcomes makes the outcomes look softer. Replace with behavior change.

4.57M vs 715 looks like a broken funnel until you add one line.

Right now the only CTA is at the bottom of a long scroll. Put it where the recruiter is.

One line above the film grid answers "why is this in a design portfolio." Without it, it reads as a hobby section.

The markdown already contains them — Autodesk's CSM-capacity over-design, Wipro's four-tier cut-to-three, EY's late pivot from mass channels. Don't bury them. These are the trust-builders.

"Launch pad / mission profile / operator log" earns its place in the process section. It doesn't need to govern the career arc too. Drop the metaphor for the biographical content.

Between the hero (dark, teal particles) and the Design & Transformation Impact block (dark), there's a three-screen light-mode section: "Experience isn't one moment" + headshot + AI for Product Strategy credential. It's visually shocking in a way nothing else on the site is, and reads as a leftover from a different portfolio template. Either convert that whole stretch to dark — matching the rest — or commit to a two-theme site with a rationale (e.g. "story in light, work in dark"). Right now it's neither.

"AI for Product Strategy · View credential ↗" sits alone in a full-width white card on the homepage. One credential by itself reads defensive ("look, I have AI experience") rather than substantive. Either gather 3–4 credentials into a single strip (Northwestern Kellogg-style row), or fold it into the About page's existing content. It doesn't earn a standalone viewport.

Below the Double Diamond, four consecutive sections — How I choose, What I do, What working together feels like, Career arc — all use the same outlined-card template. The diamond spent visual budget on a strong moment; then the page spends the rest of its scroll on uniform boxes. Rescue the opening by giving only one of those four sections the card treatment. The others become typographic sections — headline, body, done.

The Business tier expands to show "Strategic success planning", "Executive business review", "Adoption roadmap" etc. as teal-outlined pill chips. At a glance they look like interactive filter tags — they're not. Switch to plain text with a separator dot, or a single-line list. Preserve the tap affordance on the tier row itself; kill the pill styling.

First screen on iPhone: tiny eyebrow tag, 2-line H1, 3-line subhead, then ~40% empty dark panel and a decorative teal wave. The next scroll lands on a logo strip. You've used your most valuable real estate on atmosphere.

T-90 / T-30 / T+10 / T+90 launch timeline → double-diamond mission → L-0 through L-6 lander narrative → "even over" values → "what I do" bays → "CH 01–04" telemetry → Operator Log (career arc). Each frame is clever. Together they're a costume change every screen.

The Operator/Role/Engagements/Scope/Window card on mobile reads as five identical rows of text. It's the best kind of data on the site, rendered at the lowest density.

Five "X even over Y" cards stacked identically. Teal label + grey body × 5. The rhythm dies. This is a pacing problem, not a content problem.

"CH 01 · LIVE" visually imitates a messenger or live broadcast UI. It's an unintentional tell. Drop the "LIVE" pill; the chapter number is enough.

Home · Impact · Signal → Story · Case Studies · About just fits. Any smaller (iPhone SE) and it wraps. Consider shortening "Signal → Story" to "Signal" on mobile breakpoints, or moving to a drawer.

DON'T KNOW / COULD BE → DO KNOW / SHOULD BE, with Discover / Define / Develop / Deliver nested inside. The staged ignition + "Payload Lock" delivery deploy language lands. This is genuinely distinctive IA. Leave it alone.